<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 1064 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307772</link>
    <description>The court granted the petitioner regular bail in a case involving financial irregularities and conspiracy leading to a significant loss to a company. Despite allegations of the petitioner&#039;s involvement in approving loans to entities linked to promoters and diverting funds, the court considered the lack of direct evidence connecting the petitioner to the misappropriation of funds. Bail was granted with conditions including restrictions on leaving Delhi without permission, contacting related company employees, and ensuring availability for legal proceedings, emphasizing that the decision did not prejudge the trial&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2023 21:29:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 1064 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307772</link>
      <description>The court granted the petitioner regular bail in a case involving financial irregularities and conspiracy leading to a significant loss to a company. Despite allegations of the petitioner&#039;s involvement in approving loans to entities linked to promoters and diverting funds, the court considered the lack of direct evidence connecting the petitioner to the misappropriation of funds. Bail was granted with conditions including restrictions on leaving Delhi without permission, contacting related company employees, and ensuring availability for legal proceedings, emphasizing that the decision did not prejudge the trial&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>