https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307771 Territorial jurisdiction was upheld because the principal company was located at Gurugram and the alleged acts of subsidiaries and co-conspirators formed part of the same chain of transactions, giving the court sufficient territorial nexus to entertain the complaint and summoning order. Anticipatory bail was then granted because investigation was complete, custodial interrogation was not shown to be necessary, and the material did not indicate active participation or pecuniary gain by the petitioner; the Court therefore treated protection under Section 438 of the Code as appropriate even in an economic offence context. en-us Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 May 2023 21:29:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307771 Territorial jurisdiction was upheld because the principal company was located at Gurugram and the alleged acts of subsidiaries and co-conspirators formed part of the same chain of transactions, giving the court sufficient territorial nexus to entertain the complaint and summoning order. Anticipatory bail was then granted because investigation was complete, custodial interrogation was not shown to be necessary, and the material did not indicate active participation or pecuniary gain by the petitioner; the Court therefore treated protection under Section 438 of the Code as appropriate even in an economic offence context. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307771