https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307774 A voluntary or confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, by itself, could not justify cancellation of bail where no substantial material linked the accused to drug trafficking at the arrest stage and the remaining allegations were left for trial. Bail was therefore upheld for the respondents other than Mohammed Afzal. By contrast, where specific material showed recovery of commercial quantity of psychotropic substances from premises occupied by Mohammed Afzal, parity with co-accused could not displace the rigour of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. His bail was cancelled and he was directed to surrender. en-us Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 May 2023 21:29:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307774 A voluntary or confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, by itself, could not justify cancellation of bail where no substantial material linked the accused to drug trafficking at the arrest stage and the remaining allegations were left for trial. Bail was therefore upheld for the respondents other than Mohammed Afzal. By contrast, where specific material showed recovery of commercial quantity of psychotropic substances from premises occupied by Mohammed Afzal, parity with co-accused could not displace the rigour of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. His bail was cancelled and he was directed to surrender. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307774