<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1373 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307778</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court indicated that at least two issues raised in the petition required consideration on a prima facie view and, accordingly, issued notice to the respondent. The order records that counsel for the respondent accepted notice. The document does not decide the merits of the petition or record any substantive finding beyond the threshold view that the issues warranted further examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2023 21:29:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1373 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307778</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court indicated that at least two issues raised in the petition required consideration on a prima facie view and, accordingly, issued notice to the respondent. The order records that counsel for the respondent accepted notice. The document does not decide the merits of the petition or record any substantive finding beyond the threshold view that the issues warranted further examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>