<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 187 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32638</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order regarding the interpretation of Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, in a case involving a refund of service tax on cancelled air travel tickets was dismissed. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee, citing a circular by the Central Board of Excise and Customs that indicated no separate refund claim was necessary as commission adjustments by airlines to travel agents already accounted for cancelled tickets, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s arguments and claim of unjust enrichment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 187 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32638</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order regarding the interpretation of Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, in a case involving a refund of service tax on cancelled air travel tickets was dismissed. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee, citing a circular by the Central Board of Excise and Customs that indicated no separate refund claim was necessary as commission adjustments by airlines to travel agents already accounted for cancelled tickets, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s arguments and claim of unjust enrichment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>