https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32632 The Tribunal allowed the stay application and remanded the appeal to the Commissioner (A) after finding that the appellants were not given a fair opportunity to contest the case regarding non-levy of Service Tax. The impugned order lacked reasoning and did not address the appellant's arguments. The Tribunal instructed the appellants to cooperate and granted them a hearing opportunity, with the matter to be resolved within four months from the date of the order. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed through remand to the Commissioner (A). en-us Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32632 The Tribunal allowed the stay application and remanded the appeal to the Commissioner (A) after finding that the appellants were not given a fair opportunity to contest the case regarding non-levy of Service Tax. The impugned order lacked reasoning and did not address the appellant's arguments. The Tribunal instructed the appellants to cooperate and granted them a hearing opportunity, with the matter to be resolved within four months from the date of the order. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed through remand to the Commissioner (A). Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32632