<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 218 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437411</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 4.88 Cr under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ruling against the appellant due to insufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of transactions and creditworthiness of share applicants. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2023 08:51:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 218 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437411</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 4.88 Cr under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ruling against the appellant due to insufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of transactions and creditworthiness of share applicants. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>