<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 211 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437404</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both assessment years, deleting penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) as the Revenue failed to establish concealment of income or filing inaccurate particulars by the Assessee. The Tribunal stressed the need to specify the exact charge for penalty imposition and require evidence to support such charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2023 08:51:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 211 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437404</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both assessment years, deleting penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) as the Revenue failed to establish concealment of income or filing inaccurate particulars by the Assessee. The Tribunal stressed the need to specify the exact charge for penalty imposition and require evidence to support such charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>