<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 210 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437403</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the claim that a rectification order was time-barred as it was within the 4 years&#039; limit from the related intimation date, not the assessment order date. The addition of Rs. 24,15,000 made through the rectification order was quashed as the AO&#039;s intention for a 5% disallowance lacked evidence, and the initial addition of Rs. 2,68,197 was considered reasonable based on past assessments. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2023 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 210 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437403</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the claim that a rectification order was time-barred as it was within the 4 years&#039; limit from the related intimation date, not the assessment order date. The addition of Rs. 24,15,000 made through the rectification order was quashed as the AO&#039;s intention for a 5% disallowance lacked evidence, and the initial addition of Rs. 2,68,197 was considered reasonable based on past assessments. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>