https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437396 A complaint alleging false evidence in proceedings before the National Company Law Tribunal was maintainable before the Special Court under the Companies Act, 2013 because the Act creates Special Courts, gives them overriding effect through its non obstante clause, and permits cognizance on a written complaint by specified persons; the bar under section 195 CrPC did not operate as a bar on the facts. The cognizance and summons order, however, was set aside because it did not show adequate reasons or proper judicial application of mind, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration by a reasoned order. en-us Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 May 2023 14:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437396 A complaint alleging false evidence in proceedings before the National Company Law Tribunal was maintainable before the Special Court under the Companies Act, 2013 because the Act creates Special Courts, gives them overriding effect through its non obstante clause, and permits cognizance on a written complaint by specified persons; the bar under section 195 CrPC did not operate as a bar on the facts. The cognizance and summons order, however, was set aside because it did not show adequate reasons or proper judicial application of mind, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration by a reasoned order. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437396