<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 194 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437387</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Original Authority for reconsideration, emphasizing a comprehensive analysis of the notifications and the applicability of Section 66A. The Tribunal highlighted the need to address all aspects raised by the appellant during the fresh adjudication proceedings to ensure a fair opportunity for personal hearing. The appeal was allowed for a thorough reconsideration of all issues involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2023 08:50:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 194 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437387</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Original Authority for reconsideration, emphasizing a comprehensive analysis of the notifications and the applicability of Section 66A. The Tribunal highlighted the need to address all aspects raised by the appellant during the fresh adjudication proceedings to ensure a fair opportunity for personal hearing. The appeal was allowed for a thorough reconsideration of all issues involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>