https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32628 The appellate tribunal allowed the stay application and appeal by remanding the case to the Original Authority for a fresh decision within four months. The tribunal considered factual inaccuracies highlighted by the appellant's advocate, emphasizing the distinction between input service credit and capital goods credit in relation to the violation of Cenvat Credit Rules. The decision was influenced by precedents cited in favor of the appellant from Commissioners of Calicut and Cochin Commissionerates. en-us Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32628 The appellate tribunal allowed the stay application and appeal by remanding the case to the Original Authority for a fresh decision within four months. The tribunal considered factual inaccuracies highlighted by the appellant's advocate, emphasizing the distinction between input service credit and capital goods credit in relation to the violation of Cenvat Credit Rules. The decision was influenced by precedents cited in favor of the appellant from Commissioners of Calicut and Cochin Commissionerates. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32628