https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437370 A contempt application alleging wilful disobedience of an earlier writ order was considered on the basis of claimed service of that order on the opposite party. The Court noted that a prima facie case for contempt existed, but it declined to issue notice at that stage and instead granted the opposite party additional time to comply with the writ directions. The applicant was also directed to facilitate service of the order and the contempt application. Notice was therefore not issued and punitive contempt proceedings were not initiated at that stage. en-us Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 May 2023 17:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437370 A contempt application alleging wilful disobedience of an earlier writ order was considered on the basis of claimed service of that order on the opposite party. The Court noted that a prima facie case for contempt existed, but it declined to issue notice at that stage and instead granted the opposite party additional time to comply with the writ directions. The applicant was also directed to facilitate service of the order and the contempt application. Notice was therefore not issued and punitive contempt proceedings were not initiated at that stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437370