<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1539 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307756</link>
    <description>Where redemption fine and penalty had been paid, the Court allowed a short window for the respondents to have their appeal listed and seek appropriate orders; failing that, the subject goods were to be released to the petitioner. The operative effect was that continued detention of the goods was made contingent on prompt pursuit of the pending appeal after compliance with the adjudication terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 21:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1539 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307756</link>
      <description>Where redemption fine and penalty had been paid, the Court allowed a short window for the respondents to have their appeal listed and seek appropriate orders; failing that, the subject goods were to be released to the petitioner. The operative effect was that continued detention of the goods was made contingent on prompt pursuit of the pending appeal after compliance with the adjudication terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>