<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1994 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307751</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) adjustments for export of finished goods, IT service costs, and technical support service costs. It emphasized consistency, proper application of the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method, and evidence of receiving and benefiting from services. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer to adhere to prescribed methods under section 92C of the Income Tax Act for ALP determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 21:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1994 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307751</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) adjustments for export of finished goods, IT service costs, and technical support service costs. It emphasized consistency, proper application of the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method, and evidence of receiving and benefiting from services. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer to adhere to prescribed methods under section 92C of the Income Tax Act for ALP determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>