<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 178 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32624</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata ruled in favor of the appellant, a commission agent, stating they should not be considered a C &amp;amp; F Agent and charged service tax for the periods 2000-01 and 2001-02. The decision was based on the introduction date of service tax on commission agents, which was after the impugned period. The appeal was allowed, and the previous order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 178 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32624</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata ruled in favor of the appellant, a commission agent, stating they should not be considered a C &amp;amp; F Agent and charged service tax for the periods 2000-01 and 2001-02. The decision was based on the introduction date of service tax on commission agents, which was after the impugned period. The appeal was allowed, and the previous order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>