<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 291 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32623</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected the stay application in a case where the Commissioner excluded the value of materials used in providing photography service from the gross amount for the purpose of levy of service tax. The Tribunal stated that granting a stay could result in the revival of the original order without proper adjudication of the issues involved. The stay application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 291 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32623</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected the stay application in a case where the Commissioner excluded the value of materials used in providing photography service from the gross amount for the purpose of levy of service tax. The Tribunal stated that granting a stay could result in the revival of the original order without proper adjudication of the issues involved. The stay application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>