https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307748 A sale agreement must be read as a whole, and a clause stating that possession was delivered on the date of execution was treated as consistent with the remaining terms and with part performance. On the facts, a notification under the Kerala Escheats and Forfeitures Act, the seller's silence after notices pointing to title defects, and the inability to explain title adequately created a strong prima facie case of defective title and suppression of material facts. The temporary injunction restraining alienation was therefore justified and confirmed, and the respondent was held to have been put in possession on the date of the agreement. en-us Tue, 19 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 May 2023 11:00:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307748 A sale agreement must be read as a whole, and a clause stating that possession was delivered on the date of execution was treated as consistent with the remaining terms and with part performance. On the facts, a notification under the Kerala Escheats and Forfeitures Act, the seller's silence after notices pointing to title defects, and the inability to explain title adequately created a strong prima facie case of defective title and suppression of material facts. The temporary injunction restraining alienation was therefore justified and confirmed, and the respondent was held to have been put in possession on the date of the agreement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307748