<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 174 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437367</link>
    <description>HC found a procedural error in the GST order against the petitioner-firm involved in road construction. The court quashed the original order dated 27.12.2021 and directed respondent to issue a fresh order after providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The petitioner did not challenge the constitutional validity of the GST provisions, and the case was disposed of with instructions for proper administrative review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 174 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437367</link>
      <description>HC found a procedural error in the GST order against the petitioner-firm involved in road construction. The court quashed the original order dated 27.12.2021 and directed respondent to issue a fresh order after providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The petitioner did not challenge the constitutional validity of the GST provisions, and the case was disposed of with instructions for proper administrative review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>