<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 166 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437359</link>
    <description>The Court found that the second show cause notice with limited response time breached natural justice principles. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded back to the respondents for fresh consideration within four weeks while ensuring the petitioner is given a proper opportunity. The writ petition was allowed with no costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 166 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437359</link>
      <description>The Court found that the second show cause notice with limited response time breached natural justice principles. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded back to the respondents for fresh consideration within four weeks while ensuring the petitioner is given a proper opportunity. The writ petition was allowed with no costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>