<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 138 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437331</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the CESTAT&#039;s decision favoring the respondent. It ruled that the assessee must pay service tax based on Rule 2A of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006, and avail CENVAT Credit accordingly. The demand for January 2007 to May 2007 was deemed unsustainable. The case was remitted to the CESTAT for re-computation of demands and to address the limitation issue within three months. No costs were ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 138 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437331</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the CESTAT&#039;s decision favoring the respondent. It ruled that the assessee must pay service tax based on Rule 2A of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006, and avail CENVAT Credit accordingly. The demand for January 2007 to May 2007 was deemed unsustainable. The case was remitted to the CESTAT for re-computation of demands and to address the limitation issue within three months. No costs were ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>