<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty u/s 11AC Overturned: No Fact Suppression, Extended Demand Period Unsustainable, Penalty Set Aside.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69572</link>
    <description>Levy of Equal amount of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - It can be seen that it was categorically held that since there is no suppression of fact, demand of extended period is not sustainable. The penalty imposed in the impugned order was held to be not warranted accordingly, the same was set aside. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 09:17:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 09:17:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty u/s 11AC Overturned: No Fact Suppression, Extended Demand Period Unsustainable, Penalty Set Aside.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69572</link>
      <description>Levy of Equal amount of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - It can be seen that it was categorically held that since there is no suppression of fact, demand of extended period is not sustainable. The penalty imposed in the impugned order was held to be not warranted accordingly, the same was set aside. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 09:17:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>