<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1712 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307744</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. The Court held that funds received for specific projects were not considered part of total receipts, and unutilized funds for designated projects did not constitute taxable income. The judgment emphasized the non-taxable status of surplus amounts generated without distribution under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 21:15:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1712 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307744</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. The Court held that funds received for specific projects were not considered part of total receipts, and unutilized funds for designated projects did not constitute taxable income. The judgment emphasized the non-taxable status of surplus amounts generated without distribution under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>