<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1170 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307746</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to re-compute the income and Transfer Pricing adjustments based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The Tribunal disagreed with the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s determination of Arm&#039;s Length Price at NIL for management services charges, emphasizing the need for evidence over business necessity assessments. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the application of a NIL ALP rate for Fully &amp;amp; Compulsorily Convertible Debentures, instead instructing the use of the SBI Prime Lending Rate with a 2% mark-up. The issues of unpaid leave encashment disallowance and interest levy were deemed inconsequential and not specifically addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 21:15:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1170 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307746</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to re-compute the income and Transfer Pricing adjustments based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The Tribunal disagreed with the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s determination of Arm&#039;s Length Price at NIL for management services charges, emphasizing the need for evidence over business necessity assessments. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the application of a NIL ALP rate for Fully &amp;amp; Compulsorily Convertible Debentures, instead instructing the use of the SBI Prime Lending Rate with a 2% mark-up. The issues of unpaid leave encashment disallowance and interest levy were deemed inconsequential and not specifically addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>