https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32607 The case involved a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) facing duty demand on finished goods and raw materials. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the duty demand on final products but set aside the duty demand on raw materials and the confiscation. The Tribunal affirmed penalties for diverting goods to the local market, even without an actual confiscation order. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue's appeal against duty confirmation on raw materials and the redemption fine. Overall, the appeals were dismissed, confirming duty demand on finished goods and penalties while setting aside duty demand on raw materials and redemption fine. en-us Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32607 The case involved a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) facing duty demand on finished goods and raw materials. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the duty demand on final products but set aside the duty demand on raw materials and the confiscation. The Tribunal affirmed penalties for diverting goods to the local market, even without an actual confiscation order. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue's appeal against duty confirmation on raw materials and the redemption fine. Overall, the appeals were dismissed, confirming duty demand on finished goods and penalties while setting aside duty demand on raw materials and redemption fine. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32607