<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (3) TMI 59 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307721</link>
    <description>Detention after arrest without production before a Magistrate within twenty-four hours was treated as a breach of the mandatory safeguard in Article 22(2) of the Constitution. Continued custody beyond that period, without Magistrate&#039;s authority, was held to be unconstitutional, and the detenue was entitled to release in habeas corpus proceedings under Article 32.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 17:41:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (3) TMI 59 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307721</link>
      <description>Detention after arrest without production before a Magistrate within twenty-four hours was treated as a breach of the mandatory safeguard in Article 22(2) of the Constitution. Continued custody beyond that period, without Magistrate&#039;s authority, was held to be unconstitutional, and the detenue was entitled to release in habeas corpus proceedings under Article 32.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>