<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 81 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437274</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for Service Tax liability, citing previous orders that waived penalties due to the absence of mens rea. The appellant&#039;s compliance in depositing the demanded amount and interest played a crucial role in the decision. The appeal was partially allowed, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the imposition of penalties under section 77 of the Finance Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 09:22:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 81 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437274</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for Service Tax liability, citing previous orders that waived penalties due to the absence of mens rea. The appellant&#039;s compliance in depositing the demanded amount and interest played a crucial role in the decision. The appeal was partially allowed, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the imposition of penalties under section 77 of the Finance Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>