<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 75 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437268</link>
    <description>HC found that the tax authority failed to provide proper opportunity to the petitioner before cancelling GST registration. The impugned order was quashed, and the show cause notice was restored. The court directed the respondent to conduct a fresh hearing, allowing the petitioner to submit reply, and mandated a final order within two weeks, while preserving the suspension of registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 75 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437268</link>
      <description>HC found that the tax authority failed to provide proper opportunity to the petitioner before cancelling GST registration. The impugned order was quashed, and the show cause notice was restored. The court directed the respondent to conduct a fresh hearing, allowing the petitioner to submit reply, and mandated a final order within two weeks, while preserving the suspension of registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>