<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 274 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32597</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals (C/419/97 and C/765/97), upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s orders in favor of the respondent. The decision stressed the necessity of proving consignment identity and providing valid justifications for value enhancement in customs cases. The ruling underscored the importance of accurate assessment and compliance with legal procedures in customs matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 274 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32597</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals (C/419/97 and C/765/97), upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s orders in favor of the respondent. The decision stressed the necessity of proving consignment identity and providing valid justifications for value enhancement in customs cases. The ruling underscored the importance of accurate assessment and compliance with legal procedures in customs matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>