<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 53 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437246</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010 is retrospective. As the assessee deposited the TDS before the due date for filing the return, no disallowance was warranted. The disallowance made by the AO was deleted, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 53 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437246</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010 is retrospective. As the assessee deposited the TDS before the due date for filing the return, no disallowance was warranted. The disallowance made by the AO was deleted, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>