<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 51 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437244</link>
    <description>Transaction value under the Customs Valuation Rules must be accepted for imported goods unless a statutory exception applies. A genuine later memorandum of agreement could not be rejected merely because an earlier agreement showed a higher price, particularly where the authorities did not dispute its bona fides and the later contract reflected a different net LDT that could explain the revised consideration. Revenue precedents were distinguished on facts because they did not involve the same valuation situation or a comparable discrepancy. The later agreement was therefore required to form the basis of valuation, and rejection of the declared price was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 51 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437244</link>
      <description>Transaction value under the Customs Valuation Rules must be accepted for imported goods unless a statutory exception applies. A genuine later memorandum of agreement could not be rejected merely because an earlier agreement showed a higher price, particularly where the authorities did not dispute its bona fides and the later contract reflected a different net LDT that could explain the revised consideration. Revenue precedents were distinguished on facts because they did not involve the same valuation situation or a comparable discrepancy. The later agreement was therefore required to form the basis of valuation, and rejection of the declared price was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>