<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 45 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437238</link>
    <description>Interim injunction is unavailable where the applicants cannot show bona fides, fail to establish a prima facie case, and do not demonstrate balance of convenience in their favour. The commentary notes that, in a Section 92 CPC trust dispute, leave had been granted only against certain defendants, the trust records and meetings were linked to Madurai, and serious doubts arose from findings of collusion and lack of clean hands. Relief was also refused because the transfer of control had already occurred by operation of law, so an injunction could not be used to reverse a completed legal event. The request to continue the status quo order was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 45 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437238</link>
      <description>Interim injunction is unavailable where the applicants cannot show bona fides, fail to establish a prima facie case, and do not demonstrate balance of convenience in their favour. The commentary notes that, in a Section 92 CPC trust dispute, leave had been granted only against certain defendants, the trust records and meetings were linked to Madurai, and serious doubts arose from findings of collusion and lack of clean hands. Relief was also refused because the transfer of control had already occurred by operation of law, so an injunction could not be used to reverse a completed legal event. The request to continue the status quo order was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>