<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1169 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307714</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s (PCIT) order under Section 263, as it did not meet the criteria of being &quot;erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue.&quot; The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had conducted a proper inquiry and taken a plausible view supported by evidence. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, emphasizing that the PCIT cannot override the AO&#039;s judgment when it is reasonable and well-founded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 21:30:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1169 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307714</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s (PCIT) order under Section 263, as it did not meet the criteria of being &quot;erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue.&quot; The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had conducted a proper inquiry and taken a plausible view supported by evidence. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, emphasizing that the PCIT cannot override the AO&#039;s judgment when it is reasonable and well-founded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>