<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1382 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307705</link>
    <description>A refund of the entire court fee is available where a dispute is settled out of court and the lis ends without judicial intervention. The distinction between a settlement reached directly by the parties and one reached through Section 89 CPC was rejected for refund purposes under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870. The operative test is whether the dispute was resolved without the court deciding the merits, not the route by which settlement occurred. On that basis, a private compromise can qualify for refund in the same way as a court-referred settlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 13:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1382 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307705</link>
      <description>A refund of the entire court fee is available where a dispute is settled out of court and the lis ends without judicial intervention. The distinction between a settlement reached directly by the parties and one reached through Section 89 CPC was rejected for refund purposes under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870. The operative test is whether the dispute was resolved without the court deciding the merits, not the route by which settlement occurred. On that basis, a private compromise can qualify for refund in the same way as a court-referred settlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>