<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 1056 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307704</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s directions for bail and exemption from personal appearance, emphasizing the limited jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 of the CrPC. The Court affirmed the police&#039;s power to conduct further investigation under Section 173(8) of the CrPC. The allegations of mala fide and retaliatory FIRs were directed to be reconsidered by the High Court. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 10:17:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 1056 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307704</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s directions for bail and exemption from personal appearance, emphasizing the limited jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 of the CrPC. The Court affirmed the police&#039;s power to conduct further investigation under Section 173(8) of the CrPC. The allegations of mala fide and retaliatory FIRs were directed to be reconsidered by the High Court. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>