https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437232 The court quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioner, an Advisor Finance at HEC, as it found he was not responsible for tax deductions or deposits and had no control over the company's affairs. The court determined that the petitioner could not be held vicariously liable for the alleged offenses due to his limited role and lack of criminal intent. The issuance of summons and process against the petitioner was also quashed, relieving him of any further legal actions in the case. en-us Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Apr 2023 09:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437232 The court quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioner, an Advisor Finance at HEC, as it found he was not responsible for tax deductions or deposits and had no control over the company's affairs. The court determined that the petitioner could not be held vicariously liable for the alleged offenses due to his limited role and lack of criminal intent. The issuance of summons and process against the petitioner was also quashed, relieving him of any further legal actions in the case. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437232