https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437211 The Court allowed the refund of court fee in a summary suit that could not proceed due to the initiation of insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It held that the plaintiff, now participating in the collective settlement under the IBC, could benefit from Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870. Emphasizing the importance of Section 89 CPC for alternative dispute resolution, the Court extended the principles of fee refund for settlements to all legally arrived at out-of-court dispute resolutions, including private settlements leading to appeal withdrawals. en-us Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 May 2023 09:08:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437211 The Court allowed the refund of court fee in a summary suit that could not proceed due to the initiation of insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It held that the plaintiff, now participating in the collective settlement under the IBC, could benefit from Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870. Emphasizing the importance of Section 89 CPC for alternative dispute resolution, the Court extended the principles of fee refund for settlements to all legally arrived at out-of-court dispute resolutions, including private settlements leading to appeal withdrawals. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437211