https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437209 Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016 confers inherent power only to make orders necessary to meet the ends of justice or prevent abuse of process; it does not permit the Tribunal to reopen concluded factual findings or recast a deliberately framed direction where no ambiguity exists. An application styled as clarification cannot be used to shift an additional financial burden arising from an admitted claim to another party, because that would amount to substantive modification of the earlier decision rather than clarification. Any such alleged error must be pursued through appellate review, not by invoking Rule 11. The requested modification was therefore held not maintainable and was declined. en-us Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 May 2023 09:08:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437209 Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016 confers inherent power only to make orders necessary to meet the ends of justice or prevent abuse of process; it does not permit the Tribunal to reopen concluded factual findings or recast a deliberately framed direction where no ambiguity exists. An application styled as clarification cannot be used to shift an additional financial burden arising from an admitted claim to another party, because that would amount to substantive modification of the earlier decision rather than clarification. Any such alleged error must be pursued through appellate review, not by invoking Rule 11. The requested modification was therefore held not maintainable and was declined. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437209