https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437201 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's order disallowing CENVAT Credit based on supplementary invoices, citing non-compliance with Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner's re-adjudication violated the Doctrine of Merger, leading to the decision in favor of the Appellant for failing to follow Tribunal directions and legal requirements for claiming credit. The impugned order was overturned, granting the Appellant consequential relief. en-us Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 30 Apr 2023 13:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437201 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's order disallowing CENVAT Credit based on supplementary invoices, citing non-compliance with Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner's re-adjudication violated the Doctrine of Merger, leading to the decision in favor of the Appellant for failing to follow Tribunal directions and legal requirements for claiming credit. The impugned order was overturned, granting the Appellant consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437201