<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437196</link>
    <description>A broad arbitration clause covering all disputes arising out of or in connection with a development agreement extended to a dispute over whether the agreement stood cancelled or could be lawfully cancelled, so the controversy was referable to arbitration. A proceeding under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for cancellation of an instrument is not an action in rem, and therefore does not exclude arbitration. The High Court&#039;s refusal to give effect to the arbitration clause was unwarranted, the referral order under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was restored, and the dispute was directed to proceed in arbitration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2023 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437196</link>
      <description>A broad arbitration clause covering all disputes arising out of or in connection with a development agreement extended to a dispute over whether the agreement stood cancelled or could be lawfully cancelled, so the controversy was referable to arbitration. A proceeding under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for cancellation of an instrument is not an action in rem, and therefore does not exclude arbitration. The High Court&#039;s refusal to give effect to the arbitration clause was unwarranted, the referral order under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was restored, and the dispute was directed to proceed in arbitration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>