https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307701 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner's claim to count services with Auto Tractors Limited (A.T.L.) for pensionary purposes. It was held that the services with A.T.L. were not pensionable under the U.P. Retirement Benefit Rules 1961 and Civil Services Regulations. The court emphasized that the rules governing absorption of retrenched employees did not extend to counting non-pensionable service periods for pension calculations. The petitioner's reliance on a previous judgment was deemed irrelevant, and the government orders examined did not support the petitioner's claim. The writ petition was dismissed for lacking legal and factual basis. en-us Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 30 Apr 2023 20:35:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307701 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner's claim to count services with Auto Tractors Limited (A.T.L.) for pensionary purposes. It was held that the services with A.T.L. were not pensionable under the U.P. Retirement Benefit Rules 1961 and Civil Services Regulations. The court emphasized that the rules governing absorption of retrenched employees did not extend to counting non-pensionable service periods for pension calculations. The petitioner's reliance on a previous judgment was deemed irrelevant, and the government orders examined did not support the petitioner's claim. The writ petition was dismissed for lacking legal and factual basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307701