<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1975 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307698</link>
    <description>Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 applies to agricultural land where the property devolves by succession, because the source of title is inheritance under the Act rather than an independent inter vivos transfer. The Court treated the preferential right of other Class I heirs as part of the statutory scheme governing devolution of inherited property and held that it is enforceable in respect of agricultural land. The earlier exclusion of agricultural land from the concurrent field did not displace Section 22, and the limited exception in Section 4(2) for tenancy rights did not prevent its operation. The preferential right was therefore available against the transferred interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2023 21:08:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1975 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307698</link>
      <description>Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 applies to agricultural land where the property devolves by succession, because the source of title is inheritance under the Act rather than an independent inter vivos transfer. The Court treated the preferential right of other Class I heirs as part of the statutory scheme governing devolution of inherited property and held that it is enforceable in respect of agricultural land. The earlier exclusion of agricultural land from the concurrent field did not displace Section 22, and the limited exception in Section 4(2) for tenancy rights did not prevent its operation. The preferential right was therefore available against the transferred interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>