<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1888 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307691</link>
    <description>Rescission of the 1991 absorption framework terminated the unabsorbed retrenched employees&#039; pending right to be considered for absorption, while preserving completed absorptions and pay protection for employees already absorbed. The 2009 Act maintained that position through deemed rescission and limited savings. Prior service in the former undertaking could not be counted for pensionary benefits because the governing absorption rules contained no enabling provision. The special appeal was partially allowed on the pension claim, while protections and consequential benefits for already absorbed employees were maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2023 20:38:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1888 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307691</link>
      <description>Rescission of the 1991 absorption framework terminated the unabsorbed retrenched employees&#039; pending right to be considered for absorption, while preserving completed absorptions and pay protection for employees already absorbed. The 2009 Act maintained that position through deemed rescission and limited savings. Prior service in the former undertaking could not be counted for pensionary benefits because the governing absorption rules contained no enabling provision. The special appeal was partially allowed on the pension claim, while protections and consequential benefits for already absorbed employees were maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>