https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307687 A remission policy may validly exclude classes of convicts where the classification is based on intelligible differentia and a rational nexus to the object of the policy. Offences such as rape, dowry death, murder of a child, dacoity, robbery, offences against the State, and serious special enactment offences were treated as grave enough to justify exclusion from remission without offending Article 14. Section 432 was treated as a broad power to suspend, remit or commute sentences, while Section 433A was held to impose only a limited statutory bar in specified cases and not to extinguish the Government's power to frame a rational class-based remission policy. en-us Mon, 17 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Apr 2023 12:39:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307687 A remission policy may validly exclude classes of convicts where the classification is based on intelligible differentia and a rational nexus to the object of the policy. Offences such as rape, dowry death, murder of a child, dacoity, robbery, offences against the State, and serious special enactment offences were treated as grave enough to justify exclusion from remission without offending Article 14. Section 432 was treated as a broad power to suspend, remit or commute sentences, while Section 433A was held to impose only a limited statutory bar in specified cases and not to extinguish the Government's power to frame a rational class-based remission policy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307687