<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 663 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307686</link>
    <description>Employees who were not regularly appointed and lacked the prescribed qualifications could not claim absorption in the higher posts sought, because they did not satisfy the takeover conditions or the recruitment rules framed under Article 309. They were nevertheless adjusted against suitable administrative posts for which they were eligible, rather than being retrenched. The Tribunal&#039;s direction protecting their existing pay scale and directing absorption was treated as an equitable adjustment consistent with the service arrangement and not contrary to the governing rules. Further promotion was available only in accordance with the applicable rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2023 11:20:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 663 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307686</link>
      <description>Employees who were not regularly appointed and lacked the prescribed qualifications could not claim absorption in the higher posts sought, because they did not satisfy the takeover conditions or the recruitment rules framed under Article 309. They were nevertheless adjusted against suitable administrative posts for which they were eligible, rather than being retrenched. The Tribunal&#039;s direction protecting their existing pay scale and directing absorption was treated as an equitable adjustment consistent with the service arrangement and not contrary to the governing rules. Further promotion was available only in accordance with the applicable rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>