<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1217 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437191</link>
    <description>The court directed the Competent Authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s application for ex-post facto approval for Foreign Direct Investment, emphasizing the need for a fresh review due to previous rejections lacking substantive consideration. The petitioner was instructed to apply through the National Single Window System within two weeks. The court highlighted the prolonged delay in processing the application and mandated a decision within three months, with potential consequences for non-compliance. The petitioner retained the option to seek revival if the order was not implemented. No separate judgment was delivered by the judges in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2023 09:08:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1217 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437191</link>
      <description>The court directed the Competent Authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s application for ex-post facto approval for Foreign Direct Investment, emphasizing the need for a fresh review due to previous rejections lacking substantive consideration. The petitioner was instructed to apply through the National Single Window System within two weeks. The court highlighted the prolonged delay in processing the application and mandated a decision within three months, with potential consequences for non-compliance. The petitioner retained the option to seek revival if the order was not implemented. No separate judgment was delivered by the judges in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>