https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437189 While the statutory appeal against assessment remained pending, the Court addressed whether demand recovery and consequential bank attachment should continue. It considered that part of the demand had already been recovered through withdrawal from the petitioner's bank accounts and, to balance the interests of justice, protected the petitioner from further coercive recovery for the balance amount until the appeal was decided. The Court also directed expeditious disposal of the appeal within twelve weeks and raised the bank attachment to that extent. en-us Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437189 While the statutory appeal against assessment remained pending, the Court addressed whether demand recovery and consequential bank attachment should continue. It considered that part of the demand had already been recovered through withdrawal from the petitioner's bank accounts and, to balance the interests of justice, protected the petitioner from further coercive recovery for the balance amount until the appeal was decided. The Court also directed expeditious disposal of the appeal within twelve weeks and raised the bank attachment to that extent. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437189