<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1189 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437163</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court reviewed the auction process conducted by IDBI for M/s Bharat Commerce &amp;amp; Industries Limited under BIFR&#039;s directions. The auction lacked transparency, as the reserve price was undisclosed, and no competitive bidding occurred, resulting in a low bid acceptance. The appellants failed to comply with ASC guidelines, leading to the High Court setting aside the auction and ordering a fresh bidding process. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, emphasizing the need for competitive bidding to secure the property&#039;s optimum value. The appeals were dismissed, and the appellants were refunded their deposit for a new auction process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2023 09:06:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1189 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437163</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court reviewed the auction process conducted by IDBI for M/s Bharat Commerce &amp;amp; Industries Limited under BIFR&#039;s directions. The auction lacked transparency, as the reserve price was undisclosed, and no competitive bidding occurred, resulting in a low bid acceptance. The appellants failed to comply with ASC guidelines, leading to the High Court setting aside the auction and ordering a fresh bidding process. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, emphasizing the need for competitive bidding to secure the property&#039;s optimum value. The appeals were dismissed, and the appellants were refunded their deposit for a new auction process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>