<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1189 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437163</link>
    <description>Sale of a sick industrial company&#039;s asset could not be sustained where the disposal process lacked valuation, the reserve price was not disclosed, and the prescribed auction conditions were breached. The successful bidder failed to provide the required bank guarantee and did not pay the consideration within time, so the confirmation of sale was invalid despite the purported auction. A later higher offer did not by itself displace a completed auction, but it supported the need for a fresh lawful process because the original sale was not conducted on a proper statutory footing. The restored rejection of the bid was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2023 09:06:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1189 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437163</link>
      <description>Sale of a sick industrial company&#039;s asset could not be sustained where the disposal process lacked valuation, the reserve price was not disclosed, and the prescribed auction conditions were breached. The successful bidder failed to provide the required bank guarantee and did not pay the consideration within time, so the confirmation of sale was invalid despite the purported auction. A later higher offer did not by itself displace a completed auction, but it supported the need for a fresh lawful process because the original sale was not conducted on a proper statutory footing. The restored rejection of the bid was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>