<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1185 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437159</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad addressed issues related to business income and unexplained cash credits in a case resulting from a search and seizure operation. The Assessing Officer&#039;s additions were partially upheld by the CIT(A), who directed a lower profit rate for business income but sustained the addition under section 68. The treatment of interest income as &#039;income from business&#039; was also affirmed by the Tribunal, allowing the appeals for statistical purposes. The delay in filing appeals due to the imprisonment of the company director was condoned, emphasizing the need for fair adjudication considering all relevant circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 21:21:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1185 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437159</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad addressed issues related to business income and unexplained cash credits in a case resulting from a search and seizure operation. The Assessing Officer&#039;s additions were partially upheld by the CIT(A), who directed a lower profit rate for business income but sustained the addition under section 68. The treatment of interest income as &#039;income from business&#039; was also affirmed by the Tribunal, allowing the appeals for statistical purposes. The delay in filing appeals due to the imprisonment of the company director was condoned, emphasizing the need for fair adjudication considering all relevant circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>