https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307675 The court found that the University violated principles of natural justice by not informing the petitioner of specific charges beforehand and conducting a detailed inquiry. It also noted that there was no evidence to support the University's assumption regarding alleged misconduct. The court deemed the University's order as a non-speaking order, lacking reasons or discussion of evidence. The petitioner was not provided with the Disciplinary Committee's report, depriving him of a defense opportunity. Relying on relevant case law, the court quashed the University's order, directed result declaration, and allowed the appeal, disposing of related applications. en-us Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Apr 2023 21:10:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307675 The court found that the University violated principles of natural justice by not informing the petitioner of specific charges beforehand and conducting a detailed inquiry. It also noted that there was no evidence to support the University's assumption regarding alleged misconduct. The court deemed the University's order as a non-speaking order, lacking reasons or discussion of evidence. The petitioner was not provided with the Disciplinary Committee's report, depriving him of a defense opportunity. Relying on relevant case law, the court quashed the University's order, directed result declaration, and allowed the appeal, disposing of related applications. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307675